Comment on “Inside The Earth — The Heartfire Model”

Here you can comment on, or see comments made on, “Inside The Earth — The Heartfire Model .

A new and penetrating analysis of what’s inside our planet.

This article uses known data on the Earth and the stars to produce a very new picture of what’s beneath the surface of the Earth. At the very centre is the Core, which is packed with neutrons. Outside that is the Mesolayer, a supercritical liquid where elements are built up from hydrogen. Beyond that is the Mantle, solid rock equivalent to MORB. The Crust is a discontinuous layer forming the continental surfaces, derived from extensively reworked MORB.

Click here to go to the article itself,  at: Inside The Earth — The Heartfire Model.

You can enter a comment on the article below. All comments welcome.


  • Black Sheep  On July 27, 2014 at 1:23 am

    Very fascinating. This article could give credence to an inner neutron core …


  • William C Wesley  On April 28, 2015 at 11:45 am

    What about the subduction zones though, are you suggesting they do not exist or that they exist but are in effect running a deficit, the subsumed crust not occurring at the same rate as the emerging crust? I’d like clarification on this point. also how did the neutrons collect at the center of the earth, where do they come from and how much overall expansion is possible, what is the rate of expansion now and what was the rate of expansion in the past?

    David Noel comments: Yes, subduction is purely a theoretical invention, no ‘evidence’ of it stands up to scrutiny. Core neutrons are formed during initial aggregation of a larger body, purely through gravitational compression (of protons + electrons, essentially hydrogen atoms). Mars is just big enough to have originally built up a small neutron core, enough to cause expansion for its first million years or so, creating the huge Valles Marineris canyon. Now its core is dissipated, hence little magnetic field.

    Currently the Earth’s average rate of radial expansion is about 1.6 cm /yr ( — it has doubled in radius over last 200 million years or so. It still has plenty of expansion left, with remaining neutrons sufficient to create a fair-sized magnetic field (in conjunction with core rotation).


  • DAVID McCORMICK  On May 8, 2015 at 12:14 pm

    DAVID McCORMICK commented on Comment on “How The Neanderthals Became The Basques”

    This article traces the fascinating story of what happened to the Neanderthals — they merged with the rest of humanity, and …

    Your article is fascinating. My RH blood group is A+. My haplogroup tree information is: R1b1a2a1b4 and L-21. My mitochondrial DNA group is H14a. My earliest known male line relative was a resident of County Derry, in Northern Ireland. My mother’s female descent appears to go to Rhineland – Switzerland – Germany area. I am confident that DNA research may be helpful in areas of medical treatment. I encourage more study of this subject. Thanks again for a fascinating article.


  • Vedat Shehu  On May 8, 2015 at 9:03 pm

    New comment waiting approval on commentmaster
    Vedat Shehu commented on Comment on “The Cosmic Smog model for solar system formation”
    Here you can comment on, or see comments made on, “The Cosmic Smog model for solar system formation”. (With a new and …
    Dear Colleague David Noel,
    I Know your active interpretations about Earth and Cosmos, and, in my last Scientific Pamphlet titled “The Earth’s Core, an Energetic Cosmic Object” , I quoted only one article of yours titled “Fixed-Earth and Expanding-Earth Theories”. There in article the Expansion is interpreted correctly as main alternative In Global Tectonics , real mobile theoory facing the Fixed Erath of PT, [] I evaluate very high your interpretations.
    Now, informed about your new variant of planet formation process separately from stars, I saw with greater attention your article titled “The Cosmic Smog model for solar system formation, and the nature of ‘Dark Matter”. Regardless of my different core kernel theory, your smog model reaches to some new conclusions that are similar to mines.
    Firstly, in your model the objects of a solar system (central star, planets, planetoids, dwarf planetoids) are independently formed . It is well argued conform current dominant theory that treats the origin having starting point the molecular shape of matter. Even my theory starting from another premise reached to same conclusion.
    Secondly, your conclusion that CMBR is stabilized radiating receiving-editing equilibrium from energetic sources over common cold matter filled space between stars. Even my interpretations points to your conclusion.
    Thirty, Consequently, by you model, are formed even rogue planets orbiting independently galaxy, as to be remote stars. This is first interpretation I met. Staring from my point of view I reached to the same conclusion.
    Fourth, your arguments to Big Bang are reinforcing mines; I argue that modern theology interfered in scientific achievements and using sophisticated mathematical methods, astrophysical discoveries, computing modeling, and above biblical mythological premises, and it calculates how many years ago has been created cosmic sky and Earth with everything inside.
    Some comment.-
    On Ort Cloud: I overview differently on your interpretations about the role you gives to “Ort Cloud Soup”. As it seems to me, there are lack of arguments to be clearer difference between what is outer solar sphere producing comets named “Ort Cloud” and “Ort soup scattered between stars”.
    Dark Matter: In fact the dark matter remains a hypothetic, and, as it seems to me, relevant calculation for its existence point to an abstract matter concentration emitting gravitational fluxes, respectively gravitational energy called black energy (not electromagnetic energy). This concept for black matter, I think, exclude interpretation that its gravitational manifestation is done by scattered atom-molecular matter of “Ort Soup”.
    Interior energy; As it seems to me, such new way of interpretation needs new view on such great difference in productions of the independent interior energy, not only for planets and planetoids (Pluto, moons, etc), but even for dwarf planetoids as big asteroids are Vesta, Ceres, etc. Furthermore we need to interpret. Furthermore, must be interpreted inner energy produced inside the rogue planets, brown dwarfs and dark dwarfs.
    Vedat Shehu
    Approve Trash | Mark as Spam

    More information about Vedat Shehu


  • RITESH  On January 2, 2016 at 8:21 am

    Really appreciated article, because it is explained in very easy terms that can be easily understood by readers — thank you.


  • vedshehu  On October 8, 2017 at 5:33 pm

    Essence of the Earth is its energetic core structure. Outer core labeled as liquid outer core is fatually mid Earth molten geosphere and it mass flows mainly outside through matles hot plumes up to volcnic foci ad spilled as lava. While a fraction of the molten mass goes inward and is stiffened in inner core. The flown molten mass is replased by trasformation of the ultrathin ultradense transformable core kernel positionned between both core. The plaet’s core kernels originated from supernova explosion, and trgered nebula to bevome planetary disk. This is theory of mine. Vedat Shehu


  • vedshehu  On September 25, 2018 at 2:53 pm

    Very superfitial interpretation. In fact, the Earth’s core has enefgetic structure; Earth’s mesosphere in molten state is magmma’s reseroir; its mass goes outward andd js stiffened as additional silicat mass of the core’s cover iin growing process. Consrquently outgone molten mass is replased by core kernel transformation, which is positioned as ultratvbhin, ultradense center-spherical layer somwhere at the bottom of the magma’s reservor, originated during planet-formation process from super nova explosion.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: